Weather/Maine/Instruments/HARM1
Harris Dam
At a dam in Somerset County, MaineAt a dam
DCP network, identified by the register
- Identifier
- HARM1
- Latitude
- 45.46670 N
- Longitude
- 69.86670 W
- Elevation
- -
- Listed
- Automatically, on 336 reports in 169 hours over the last seven days
- Rank
- 142of 312 in Maine, Oct 4
Now, today, and the week
On the radar over Harris DamReflectivityStorm topsRain rateRain, last 24 hoursForecast temperatureForecast rain totalEvery picture
Weather instrument stations by state
At a dam
Drawn as the kind of place it stands at. 4 instruments in Maine stand at one.
What the snow tracker reads here
Every instrument in this state
-in
Snow on the ground
Station charts
Harris Dam Report
Rank 142 of 312 in Maine, Oct 4. The 247 rank orders a state's stations by their 247 score out of 100: how reliably they report, how accurate their readings are against a reference station, how their readings pass their checks, and how they stand against the forecast.
247 score97.5of 100
- Reports receivedweight 35100.0336 of 336 scheduled reports received in 7 days
- Arrivalweight 1078.7half its reports arrived within 21 min
- Continuityweight 10100.0longest silence 31 min, on a schedule of one report every 30 min
- Accuracyweight 20--
- Instrument checksweight 15--
- Forecast checkweight 10--
The score is the weighted mean of its six parts, from the last 7 days. How a station is ranked sets out each part.
- Rank
- 142of 312 in Maine, Oct 4
- Schedule
- every 30 minon the hour's :00 and :30
- Reports received, 24 hours
- 47 of 4897.9% of its schedule
- Reports received, 7 days
- 335 of 33699.7% of its schedule
- Days reported, 30 days
- -
- Longest silence, 7 days
- 61 minfrom Oct 3, 11:59 PM
- Latest report
- Oct 4, 7:00 AMlocal time
- Time to reach Storm Station
- 21 min9 in 10 within 21 min
From Storm Station's own record of every report it heard from this station.
Its schedule is one report every 30 min, 48 in 24 hours. Two reports in the same 30 min count as one received.
The ranking these charts were drawn from, as tables
| Share of scheduled reports received | Stations |
|---|---|
| 100% | 126 |
| 90 to 99% | 106 |
| 80 to 89% | 18 |
| 70 to 79% | 9 |
| 60 to 69% | 24 |
| 50 to 59% | 10 |
| 40 to 49% | 3 |
| 30 to 39% | 12 |
| 20 to 29% | 0 |
| 10 to 19% | 0 |
| 0 to 9% | 4 |
| Day | Rank | Stations ranked | Share received |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2026 | 142 | 312 | 100.0% |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 | 306 | 100.0% |
| Oct 2, 2026 | 138 | 306 | 100.0% |
| Oct 1, 2026 | 1 | 211 | 100.0% |
| Sep 30, 2026 | 55 | 206 | 100.0% |
| Sep 29, 2026 | 48 | 206 | 100.0% |
| Sep 28, 2026 | 48 | 197 | 100.0% |
| Sep 27, 2026 | 63 | 157 | 100.0% |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 111 | 157 | 97.8% |
The whole record, Sep 17, 2011 to Oct 28, 2014, 157 days reported.
The readings these charts were drawn from, as a table
| Month | Average high F | Average low F | Record high F | Record low F | Average precipitation in | Strongest gust mph |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Feb | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mar | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Apr | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| May | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jun | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jul | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Aug | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sep | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oct | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nov | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dec | - | - | - | - | - | - |